Frances McDormand's Oscar acceptance speech (Magnerd, 2018) |
Frances McDormand has had a lot of speeches to give this year after winning the Best Actress category at the Golden Globes, the Screen Actors Guild Awards, the BAFTAs and the Academy Awards, and she's used that platform every single time to say something about gender inequality in Hollywood and make change happen. Her final words of her final speech were 'inclusion rider', and the fact that those words had no meaning to most of the population until she said them is the exact reason she did.
In 2016, Stacy Smith, professor at the University of Southern California and founder of the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, gave a TED talk (below) on her ten years of research into gender in the film industry. She gives a disclaimer at the start that "my data are really depressing. So I want to apologise in advance, because I'm going to put you all in a really bad mood. But I'm going to bring it up at the end, and I'm going to present a silver lining to fix this mess that we've been in for a very, very long time."
Stacy Smith: The Data Behind Hollywood's Sexism (TED, 2016)
Smith's data, while it focuses predominantly on representation on scree, reflects the facts of Follows and co.'s research discovered in the previous post; in both the UK and America, there are not enough women behind the camera. More female directors means more women in key creative and crew roles, and on screen.
One of the action points that the research indicated could change the state of diversity in Hollywood films was for big-name actors to place inclusion riders in their contracts - a clause that demands that the films they work on meet a certain level of diversity in cast and crew.
Actor Michael B Jordan is the latest to join the big names taking up the clause in their contracts, including Brie Larson:
Nothing has yet been said against inclusion riders in the press - most articles have been explaining the concept rather than questioning it - but some members of the general public have responded to Larson's tweet with concerns that with inclusion riders, people will be hired an cast based on their ethnicity, sexuality, gender or ability over and above talent. I asked the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative what they thought about this:I’m committed to the Inclusion Rider. Who’s with me? https://t.co/yvQ0wR5D80— Brie Larson (@brielarson) March 5, 2018
That's actually not quite true. Talent is prioritized and ensures auditioning for smaller roles is open and accessible and not affected by implicit bias. TV is more equitable, which means that film can be too.— Annenberg Inclusion Initiative (@Inclusionists) March 10, 2018
As for behind the camera, it is much like the Rooney Rule ensuring that the closed networks need to interview and hopefully hire talented crew in a limited number of jobs. It is consistent with the policy notion of least restrictive means.— Annenberg Inclusion Initiative (@Inclusionists) March 10, 2018
Inclusion riders are an exciting prospect, and are one way that change can truly start to happen. They can work alongside policies such as JJ Abrams' diversity quota which was introduced to his production company Bad Robot following last year's Academy Awards. With those in power supporting those who have long denied it, the power structures that have been put in place can and will be replaced with equality.
What do you think about inclusion riders? What else can we be doing to continue changing the old system? Comment below!
Read more:
- Read about the Annenberg Inclusion Institute's work
- Prominent women of colour in the industry discuss the fight for equal pay
- Ava DuVernay talks about A Wrinkle In Time, the first film with over $100m budget to be directed by a woman of colour
See 'Bibliography' tab on home page for all references.
Comments
Post a Comment